Sunday, September 4, 2016

The Electoral College Map (9/4/16)



New State Polls (9/4/16)
State
Poll
Date
Margin of Error
Sample
Clinton
Trump
Undecided
Poll Margin
FHQ Margin
North Carolina
8/30-9/2
+/- 4.0%
1088 likely voters
46
42
4
+4
+1.89
Pennsylvania
8/30-9/2
+/- 4.1%
1091 likely voters
45
37
6
+8
+5.96


Polling Quick Hits:
Following a week on hiatus YouGov returned to what during August had become regularly occurring Sunday poll releases. With the addition of new surveys from North Carolina and Pennsylvania, the internet polling firm has since the conventions released individual polls from 10 of the now-expanded list of 13 battleground states they are tracking with CBS. Only Colorado, Michigan and Wisconsin lack updates from YouGov in that time.


North Carolina:
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, the polls may go back and forth as to which of the two major party candidates has the advantage in the Tar Heel state, but in the aggregate, it is clear that Hillary Clinton has a small but persistent lead there. And in this new YouGov survey, it is Clinton's "turn" to be in the lead. Compared to the last update in North Carolina (from YouGov in June), Trump has held steady while Clinton has gained a couple of points. Trump's share of support is in the heart of his range of results across all surveys conducted in the state in 2016. Clinton, on the other hand, is at the very upper end of her North Carolina range.

All that is to say that this poll confirms the overarching state of play in the race for North Carolina's 15 electoral votes.


Pennsylvania:
The same sort of pattern that has occurred in North Carolina is true in Pennsylvania as well. The only difference is that Clinton's edge in the Keystone state is more comfortable. Her advantage there has been just as consistent, but turned to a deeper shade of blue than North Carolina. Looking at the post-convention landscape, this eight point margin for Clinton is basically par for the course. It is yet another near double digit lead that perhaps runs counter to the rebound that Trump has seen over the last couple of weeks.

FHQ does not want to make too much of an apples to oranges comparison here, but whereas Clinton was running toward the top of her range in the North Carolina poll, both she and Trump are more tightly in line with the FHQ average shares for each in Pennsylvania. It is a "normal looking" survey that tends to confirm the dynamics there. It is a sign of steadiness in a sea of seeming volatility.


--
As the new additions to the dataset did not shake up the averages in either state, they obviously had a minimal effect on the infographics here. The map, Electoral College Spectrum and Watch List were unchanged from the last update a day ago.





The Electoral College Spectrum1
HI-42
(7)
NJ-14
(175)
PA-203
(269 | 289)
MO-10
(155)
TN-11
(58)
MD-10
(17)
DE-3
(178)
NH-43
(273 | 269)
AK-3
(145)
LA-8
(47)
RI-4
(21)
ME-4
(182)
FL-29
(302 | 265)
KS-6
(142)
SD-3
(39)
MA-11
(32)
NM-5
(187)
OH-18
(320 | 236)
UT-6
(136)
ND-3
(36)
VT-3
(35)
WI-10
(197)
NC-15
(335 | 218)
TX-38
(130)
ID-4
(33)
CA-55
(90)
OR-7
(204)
IA-6
(341 | 203)
IN-11
(92)
NE-5
(29)
NY-29
(119)
MI-16
(220)
NV-6
(347 | 197)
MS-6
(81)
WV-5
(24)
IL-20
(139)
CT-7
(227)
GA-16
(191)
AR-6
(75)
AL-9
(19)
WA-12
(151)
CO-9
(236)
AZ-11
(175)
MT-3
(69)
OK-7
(10)
MN-10
(161)
VA-13
(249)
SC-9
(164)
KY-8
(66)
WY-3
(3)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (all Clinton's toss up states plus Pennsylvania), he would have 289 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Clinton's number is on the left and Trumps's is on the right in bold italics.


To keep the figure to 50 cells, Washington, DC and its three electoral votes are included in the beginning total on the Democratic side of the spectrum. The District has historically been the most Democratic state in the Electoral College.

3 New Hampshire and Pennsylvania are collectively the states where Clinton crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election. That line is referred to as the victory line. If those two states are separated with Clinton winning Pennsylvania and Trump, New Hampshire, then there would be a tie in the Electoral College.



NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Clinton and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.


The Watch List1
State
Switch
Alaska
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
Arkansas
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Delaware
from Strong Clinton
to Lean Clinton
Georgia
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Clinton
Indiana
from Lean Trump
to Strong Trump
Mississippi
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Missouri
from Toss Up Trump
to Lean Trump
Nevada
from Toss Up Clinton
to Toss Up Trump
New Hampshire
from Lean Clinton
to Toss Up Clinton
New Jersey
from Strong Clinton
to Lean Clinton
Pennsylvania
from Lean Clinton
to Toss Up Clinton
Virginia
from Lean Clinton
to Toss Up Clinton
1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.



Saturday, September 3, 2016

The Electoral College Map (9/3/16)



New State Polls (9/3/16)
State
Poll
Date
Margin of Error
Sample
Clinton
Trump
Undecided
Poll Margin
FHQ Margin
New Hampshire
8/20-8/28
+/- 4.7%
417 likely voters
43
32
5
+11
+5.52


Polling Quick Hits:
There was one late Friday poll out of New Hampshire that failed to get in in time here at FHQ for yesterday's update.


New Hampshire:
UNH has been known to produce some outlier polls, but this August edition of the Granite Poll is fairly consistent with the bulk of the post-convention polling in the state. However, it is a poll that does not seem to be tracking with the narrowing of the national (and other state-level) polls over the last week or two. Still, both candidates are well within the range they have been in in New Hampshire. It just that Clinton is on the high end of her range and Trump is on the low end of his when he has lately been rebounding from the slump he suffered through in the couple of weeks after the conventions.

As it stands though, New Hampshire remains in the Lean Clinton category, more than five points in Clinton's direction.


--
Everything holds steady with the addition of the new UNH poll. New Hampshire remain on the Watch List. The Spectrum and map were unchanged.





The Electoral College Spectrum1
HI-42
(7)
NJ-14
(175)
PA-203
(269 | 289)
MO-10
(155)
TN-11
(58)
MD-10
(17)
DE-3
(178)
NH-43
(273 | 269)
AK-3
(145)
LA-8
(47)
RI-4
(21)
ME-4
(182)
FL-29
(302 | 265)
KS-6
(142)
SD-3
(39)
MA-11
(32)
NM-5
(187)
OH-18
(320 | 236)
UT-6
(136)
ND-3
(36)
VT-3
(35)
WI-10
(197)
NC-15
(335 | 218)
TX-38
(130)
ID-4
(33)
CA-55
(90)
OR-7
(204)
IA-6
(341 | 203)
IN-11
(92)
NE-5
(29)
NY-29
(119)
MI-16
(220)
NV-6
(347 | 197)
MS-6
(81)
WV-5
(24)
IL-20
(139)
CT-7
(227)
GA-16
(191)
AR-6
(75)
AL-9
(19)
WA-12
(151)
CO-9
(236)
AZ-11
(175)
MT-3
(69)
OK-7
(10)
MN-10
(161)
VA-13
(249)
SC-9
(164)
KY-8
(66)
WY-3
(3)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (all Clinton's toss up states plus Pennsylvania), he would have 289 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Clinton's number is on the left and Trumps's is on the right in bold italics.


To keep the figure to 50 cells, Washington, DC and its three electoral votes are included in the beginning total on the Democratic side of the spectrum. The District has historically been the most Democratic state in the Electoral College.

3 New Hampshire and Pennsylvania are collectively the states where Clinton crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election. That line is referred to as the victory line. If those two states are separated with Clinton winning Pennsylvania and Trump, New Hampshire, then there would be a tie in the Electoral College.



NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Clinton and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.


The Watch List1
State
Switch
Alaska
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
Arkansas
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Delaware
from Strong Clinton
to Lean Clinton
Georgia
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Clinton
Indiana
from Lean Trump
to Strong Trump
Mississippi
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Missouri
from Toss Up Trump
to Lean Trump
Nevada
from Toss Up Clinton
to Toss Up Trump
New Hampshire
from Lean Clinton
to Toss Up Clinton
New Jersey
from Strong Clinton
to Lean Clinton
Pennsylvania
from Lean Clinton
to Toss Up Clinton
Virginia
from Lean Clinton
to Toss Up Clinton
1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.



Friday, September 2, 2016

The Electoral College Map (9/2/16)



New State Polls (9/2/16)
State
Poll
Date
Margin of Error
Sample
Clinton
Trump
Undecided
Poll Margin
FHQ Margin
Iowa
8/31-9/1
+/- 3.9%
600 likely voters
39.1
44.2
8.0
+5.1
+1.13
Kansas
8/22-8/23
+/- 1.55%
3966 likely voters
37
44
9
+7
+7.30
Virginia
8/30-9/1
+/- 3.4%
800 likely voters
43.5
43.0
--
+0.5
+6.00


Polling Quick Hits:
Heading into a long Labor Day weekend, there were just a few newly released surveys. Emerson recently came off a summer hiatus and the landline only firm has offered a week's worth of polls that again are either slightly out of step with other recent polling or the beginning signs of a shift. If it is the former, then there is a noticeable Trump-leaning house effect at work. New surveys from both Iowa and Virginia today highlight this issue.


Iowa:
Anything in Iowa not showing a race stuck in a range from about Clinton +3 to Trump +3 has to this point in the  race for the White House been an outlier. The new Emerson poll finds Trump up five points and seemingly fits in that outlier category. But again, it is not far outside of the range; Clinton is on the low end of her Iowa range here and Trump on the upper end of his. That could be a move in Trump's direction or it could be the type of house effect mentioned above. Polling has picked up some in Iowa, but it is among a group of states where more polling would be desirable.

This poll lowered the Iowa average here at FHQ enough to push it past North Carolina on the Electoral College Spectrum below.


Kansas:
Nearby in Kansas, a new Remington survey provides yet more evidence that the race for the Sunflower state's six electoral votes is just closer than usual in 2016. Kansas is still very much a red state, but Trump continues to lag about 15 points behind where Romney was there in 2012. That closes the gap for Clinton, who is right around Obama 2012, but not enough to make Kansas anything other than a lighter shade of red.


Virginia:
For the second consecutive day a poll was released in Virginia indicating a much closer race than has been the case throughout August. FHQ does not want to explain away either that poll or the new Emerson poll in the Old Dominion. After all, a narrowing nationally would likely mean at least some narrowing in a tangentially competitive Virginia. But the Hampton poll yesterday had a higher of undecideds than has been the case overall. That was true of the last poll they conducted in Virginia as well. That could be not pushing/prompting leaners or something else. But how those leaners break between Clinton and Trump may increase or decrease the margin in the surveys. FHQ will not back track and dip back into the Emerson issues. But the methodology -- landline only -- may be driving what is being witnessed in that series of surveys.

The most onlookers can hope for is additional polling from other firms to aid in determining evidence   as to what the true answer is to what FHQ will call the Emerson question. Both that poll and the Hampton poll pulled the average in Virginia down to six points; just enough to put the state back on the Watch List



--
Compared to yesterday, the map again remains unchanged. However, the Watch List barely adds one state (Virginia). On the Electoral College Spectrum things held steady for the most part. Iowa switched spots with North Carolina, reversing their recent shift.




The Electoral College Spectrum1
HI-42
(7)
NJ-14
(175)
PA-203
(269 | 289)
MO-10
(155)
TN-11
(58)
MD-10
(17)
DE-3
(178)
NH-43
(273 | 269)
AK-3
(145)
LA-8
(47)
RI-4
(21)
ME-4
(182)
FL-29
(302 | 265)
KS-6
(142)
SD-3
(39)
MA-11
(32)
NM-5
(187)
OH-18
(320 | 236)
UT-6
(136)
ND-3
(36)
VT-3
(35)
WI-10
(197)
NC-15
(335 | 218)
TX-38
(130)
ID-4
(33)
CA-55
(90)
OR-7
(204)
IA-6
(341 | 203)
IN-11
(92)
NE-5
(29)
NY-29
(119)
MI-16
(220)
NV-6
(347 | 197)
MS-6
(81)
WV-5
(24)
IL-20
(139)
CT-7
(227)
GA-16
(191)
AR-6
(75)
AL-9
(19)
WA-12
(151)
CO-9
(236)
AZ-11
(175)
MT-3
(69)
OK-7
(10)
MN-10
(161)
VA-13
(249)
SC-9
(164)
KY-8
(66)
WY-3
(3)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (all Clinton's toss up states plus Pennsylvania), he would have 289 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Clinton's number is on the left and Trumps's is on the right in bold italics.


To keep the figure to 50 cells, Washington, DC and its three electoral votes are included in the beginning total on the Democratic side of the spectrum. The District has historically been the most Democratic state in the Electoral College.

3 New Hampshire and Pennsylvania are collectively the states where Clinton crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election. That line is referred to as the victory line. If those two states are separated with Clinton winning Pennsylvania and Trump, New Hampshire, then there would be a tie in the Electoral College.



NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Clinton and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.


The Watch List1
State
Switch
Alaska
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
Arkansas
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Delaware
from Strong Clinton
to Lean Clinton
Georgia
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Clinton
Indiana
from Lean Trump
to Strong Trump
Mississippi
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Missouri
from Toss Up Trump
to Lean Trump
Nevada
from Toss Up Clinton
to Toss Up Trump
New Hampshire
from Lean Clinton
to Toss Up Clinton
New Jersey
from Strong Clinton
to Lean Clinton
Pennsylvania
from Lean Clinton
to Toss Up Clinton
Virginia
from Lean Clinton
to Toss Up Clinton
1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.