New State Polls (9/30/12)
| |||||||||
State
|
Poll
|
Date
|
Margin of Error
|
Sample
|
Obama
|
Romney
|
Undecided
|
Poll Margin
|
FHQ Margin
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iowa
|
9/23-9/26
|
+/- 3.8%
|
650 likely voters
|
49
|
45
|
2
|
+4
|
+2.97
| |
Maine
|
9/12-9/16
|
+/- 4.0%
|
618 likely voters
|
52
|
36
|
--
|
+16
|
+14.83
| |
Massachusetts
|
9/21-9/27
|
+/- 4.4%
|
502 likely voters
|
57
|
30
|
11
|
+27
|
+20.01
| |
Ohio
|
9/19-9/29
|
+/- 2.2%
|
1662 likely voters
|
51
|
42
|
5
|
+9
|
+3.83
| |
Washington
|
9/26
|
+/- 4.5%
|
500 likely voters
|
52
|
41
|
4
|
+11
|
+13.41
| |
Polling Quick Hits:
Iowa:
There is not a whole lot to get jazzed about in the survey conducted by the typically reliable Selzer firm. That isn't to suggest that this poll is not reliable. Rather, it is in line with other polls that have been in field post-convention. In that span, the trend has been toward the president with poll margin stretching out to as many as eight points. This Selzer poll, conducted for the Des Moines Register, however, is closer to where the FHQ weighted average has the Hawkeye state pegged at the moment.
Maine:
Another day, another Maine poll. The Obama share of support is consistent with the Rasmussen poll released on Friday while Romney's portion of the responses dipped a touch across the two polls. That impact is negligible as the FHQ weighted average stays put in the +14 Obama range. We're talking about a blue state here, folks. That said the congressional district split showed Romney within five points of the president in the second district. That one electoral vote may be borderline competitive in Maine's districted electoral vote allocation (see Nebraska's 2nd district in 2008).
Massachusetts:
FHQ has said this many times, but I'll say it again. The data is nice to the extent we get new presidential line data in any poll testing the Brown-Warren senate race in the Bay state, but it isn't entirely necessary all the same. Massachusetts is blue. Enough said.
Ohio:
The one exception to the calibrating/confirming rule is the Columbus Dispatch poll of the Buckeye state. There appears to be a little bit of a boomlet for Obama in Ohio in the last week or more. The last three polls released there have shown the president up by at least eight points. This Dispatch poll is also the fourth (of the six most recently released polls) to have the president up at least seven points. Now, is this a pattern that fundamentally reshapes the race? From a strategic perspective, a case could be made that moving Ohio off the board makes the electoral math hard for the Romney campaign. But the reality is that this is confirming poll in that it is confirming the movement in the president's direction; that any one of the earlier polls taken alone was not an outlier. This is a different kind of confirming poll, but it is a confirming poll, nonetheless.
Washington:
See Maine and Massachusetts on this one. Washington has had its moments threatening to jump into the Lean Obama category in 2012, but that has never fully manifest itself. The Evergreen state is pretty blue. The new Rasmussen poll of the state does little to deviate from that conclusion.
Looking at the map and Spectrum, what held true on Friday hold true again today. It is a status quo day. The electoral vote tally has not budged. Truth be told, it hasn't moved since FHQ began tracking the state polls back in July. There has, however, been movement on the Electoral College Spectrum. Mind you, this was small movement involving states that are not really in play anyway, but it is movement all the same. Massachusetts traded spots with Illinois. See, a small move, but one worth tracking.
The Electoral College Spectrum1
| ||||
VT-3
(6)2
|
WA-12
(158)
|
NH-4
(257)
|
MO-10
(166)
|
ND-3
(55)
|
RI-4
(10)
|
NJ-14
(172)
|
OH-183
(275/281)
|
MT-3
(156)
|
KY-8
(52)
|
NY-29
(39)
|
CT-7
(179)
|
VA-13
(288/263)
|
IN-11
(153)
|
AL-9
(44)
|
HI-4
(43)
|
NM-5
(184)
|
IA-6
(294/250)
|
GA-16
(142)
|
KS-6
(35)
|
MD-10
(53)
|
MN-10
(194)
|
CO-9
(303/244)
|
SC-9
(126)
|
AR-6
(29)
|
MA-11
(64)
|
OR-7
(201)
|
FL-29
(332/235)
|
TX-38
(117)
|
AK-3
(23)
|
IL-20
(84)
|
PA-20
(221)
|
NC-15
(206)
|
LA-8
(79)
|
OK-7
(20)
|
CA-55
(139)
|
MI-16
(237)
|
SD-3
(191)
|
NE-5
(71)
|
ID-4
(13)
|
ME-4
(143)
|
WI-10
(247)
|
AZ-11
(188)
|
WV-5
(66)
|
WY-3
(9)
|
DE-3
(146)
|
NV-6
(253)
|
TN-11
(177)
|
MS-6
(61)
|
UT-6
(6)
|
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.
2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Romney won all the states up to and including Ohio (all Obama's toss up states plus Ohio), he would have 281 electoral votes. Romney's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Obama's number is on the left and Romney's is on the right in italics. 3 Ohio is the state where Obama crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election. That line is referred to as the victory line. | ||||
As for the Watch List, well, on a day when the polls released did not do much in the way of moving the needle, the list remained untouched. It is still all about North Carolina (Florida) and the quartet of Lean/Toss Up states that the Obama campaign would rather like to keep where they are.
The Watch List1
| |||
State
|
Switch
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
Georgia
|
from Strong Romney
|
to Lean Romney
| |
Indiana
|
from Lean Romney
|
to Strong Romney
| |
Michigan
|
from Lean Obama
|
to Toss Up Obama
| |
Minnesota
|
from Lean Obama
|
to Strong Obama
| |
Montana
|
from Lean Romney
|
to Strong Romney
| |
Nevada
|
from Toss Up Obama
|
to Lean Obama
| |
New Hampshire
|
from Toss Up Obama
|
to Lean Obama
| |
New Mexico
|
from Strong Obama
|
to Lean Obama
| |
North Carolina
|
from Toss Up Romney
|
to Toss Up Obama
| |
Wisconsin
|
from Lean Obama
|
to Toss Up Obama
| |
1 The Watch list shows those states in the FHQ Weighted Average within a fraction of a point of changing categories. The List is not a trend analysis. It indicates which states are straddling the line between categories and which states are most likely to shift given the introduction of new polling data. Nevada, for example, is close to being a Lean Obama state, but the trajectory of the polling there has been moving the state away from that lean distinction.
| |||
Please see:
No comments:
Post a Comment