| Changes (August 10) | |||
| State | Before | After | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska CD1 |
Strong Trump
|
Lean Trump
|
|
Polling Quick Hits:
Arizona (Biden 49, Trump 45 via OH Predictive Insights | Trump 46, Biden 45 via Trafalgar Group):
In the Grand Canyon state, a pair of polls were fairly consistent on Donald Trump's position in the mid-40s but diverged on where Biden sits in the race for the state's 11 electoral votes. Not to dismiss the Trafalgar poll, but this was the first time the firm had been in the field in Arizona in 2020 and Phoenix-based OH Predictive has now conducted five polls this calendar year. That does not necessarily give the pollster special insight into Arizona, but that does provide a better timeline of how the race has evolved there since March. And the picture has been consistent: Biden up around 50 percent and Trump in the mid-40s. But while that is in line with where Trump has been positioned in most surveys, it is on the high end of where Biden has most often been. Trafalgar, on the other hand, has the former vice president near the low end of his share of support in the existing polling in Arizona. But again, the status quo was maintained here. Arizona remains a little more than Biden +3 at FHQ.
Maine (Biden 50, Trump 39):
Over in the Pine Tree state, RMG Research found the race for the two at-large electoral votes there to favor Biden as well. And the survey was on par with the graduated weighted average shares for both candidates and margin at FHQ. There, Biden sits at 51 percent and Trump at just over 40 percent. That is obviously not a significant difference. The real intrigue in Maine will not be statewide, however. It will be in the second congressional district. But as long as the Senate race there gets polled, there will be a steady stream of new data on the presidential race (statewide).
Michigan (Biden 47, Trump 43):
YouGov/University of Wisconsin completed a second wave of blue wall surveys and saw a tighter race in the Wolverine state than has been typical in most recent polling there. However, Biden led by the very same 47-43 back in February, so this one may show the race on the lower end of the range of recent outcomes but represents no change poll-over-poll from UW since around the time primary season kicked off.
Nebraska CD1 (Trump 48, Biden 46):
The surprise was out of Nebraska where an internal poll conducted by Strategies 360 for state Democrats found Trump ahead in the first congressional district by just two points. This is a district the president won by 20 points in 2016. This one is not to be confused with the more competitive second district around Omaha. State-level polling in 2020 has been about eight points more Democratic as measured by FHQ than was the case on election day in 2016. That is some important context for this poll which would indicate an 18 point shift toward Biden. That is shift of more than ten points more than the average across all states. This one feels a bit like the lone Arkansas survey that was released in June: a likely outlier but one that flags the district as one to watch. [NOTE: NE CD1 has been on and off the Watch List but straddling the Strong/Lean Trump line, not the competitive partisan line between the two candidates' coalitions of states.]
Pennsylvania (Biden 50, Trump 41):
The blue wall surveys from YouGov/UW also included surveys from Pennsylvania and Wisconsin a day after YouGov/CBS released polls from the pair. In the Keystone state the margin is a tad wider than yesterday's release, but well within what has been normal during the summer in Pennsylvania polling. Yet, since the first wave of these glimpses into this closest trio of states in February, the outlook has changed, shifting in Biden's direction. What was a narrow one point lead earlier this year is now a nine point advantage for the former vice president. Yes, that is on the higher end of the range of recent margins in the commonwealth, but it is in that range.
Wisconsin (Biden 49, Trump 43):
The story is much the same in Wisconsin. What was a two point edge favoring Biden in the February YouGov wave has now doubled (and nearly replicates the results from the YouGov poll from a day ago). But this poll is right in the heart of the range of summer polling in the Badger state. There are wider and narrower margins, but it all averages at FHQ to around Biden +6.2.
NOTE: A description of the methodology behind the graduated weighted average of 2020 state-level polling that FHQ uses for these projections can be found here.
The Electoral College Spectrum1
| ||||
MA-112
(14)
|
NJ-14
(173)
|
WI-10
(252)
|
AK-3
(125)
|
UT-6
(60)
|
HI-4
(18)
|
OR-7
(180)
|
PA-203
NE CD2-1
(273 | 286) |
MO-10
(122)
|
IN-11
(54)
|
CA-55
(73)
|
DE-3
(183)
|
FL-29
(302 | 265)
|
SC-9
(112)
|
ID-4
(43)
|
VT-3
(76)
|
CO-9
(192)
|
NV-6
(308 | 236)
|
MT-3
(103)
|
KY-8
(39)
|
NY-29
(105)
|
NM-5
(197)
|
AZ-11
(319 | 230)
|
NE CD1-1
KS-6
(100)
|
AL-9
(31)
|
ME CD1-1
WA-12
(118)
|
ME-2
(199)
|
NC-15
(334 | 219)
|
MS-6
(93)
|
ND-3
(22)
|
MD-10
(128)
|
VA-13
(212)
|
ME CD2-1
OH-18
(353 | 204)
|
LA-8
(87)
|
SD-3
(19)
|
IL-20
(148)
|
MN-10
(222)
|
IA-6
(185)
|
AR-6
(79)
|
OK-7
(16)
|
RI-4
(152)
|
MI-16
(238)
|
GA-16
(179)
|
NE-2
(73)
|
WV-5
(9)
|
CT-7
(159)
|
NH-4
(242)
|
TX-38
(163)
|
TN-11
(71)
|
WY-3
NE CD3-1
(4)
|
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.
2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (Biden's toss up states plus the Pennsylvania), he would have 286 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Biden's number is on the left and Trumps's is on the right in bold italics. To keep the figure to 50 cells, Washington, DC and its three electoral votes are included in the beginning total on the Democratic side of the spectrum. The District has historically been the most Democratic state in the Electoral College. 3 Pennsylvania is the state where Biden crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election, the tipping point state. | ||||
Given that most of the polls today were consistent not only with current polling in this group of mainly battleground states, but also with the FHQ averages, little changed on either the Electoral College Spectrum or the Watch List. The only mover and shaker was that initial -- albeit internal Democratic -- poll out of Nebraska's first. Since it is the first poll there, the average remains tethered to the average swings in states that finished near NE CD1 on election day in 2016. That moved the district up the middle Republican column on the Spectrum and into Lean Trump territory. However, the district stays on the Watch List. It is just that now the most likely change is back into the Strong Trump category.
The rest of the List was unaltered from a day ago. Those states and underpolled Nevada continue to be the states to keep an eye on. New polling data could change how those states are classified here.
--
There were no new polls from Nevada today.
Days since the last Nevada poll was in the field: 102.
--
NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Biden and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.
The Watch List1
| |||
State
|
Potential Switch
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
Florida
|
from Toss Up Biden
|
to Lean Biden
| |
Georgia
|
from Toss Up Trump
|
to Toss Up Biden
| |
Iowa
|
from Toss Up Trump
|
to Toss Up Biden
| |
Kansas
|
from Lean Trump
|
to Strong Trump
| |
Louisiana
|
from Strong Trump
|
to Lean Trump
| |
Maine CD2
|
from Toss Up Biden
|
to Toss Up Trump
| |
Minnesota
|
from Lean Biden
|
to Strong Biden
| |
Mississippi
|
from Strong Trump
|
to Lean Trump
| |
Missouri
|
from Toss Up Trump
|
to Lean Trump
| |
Nebraska CD1
|
from Lean Trump
|
to Strong Trump
| |
Nebraska CD2
|
from Lean Biden
|
to Toss Up Biden
| |
Ohio
|
from Toss Up Biden
|
to Toss Up Trump
| |
Pennsylvania
|
from Lean Biden
|
to Toss Up Biden
| |
South Carolina
|
from Lean Trump
|
to Toss Up Trump
| |
Virginia
|
from Strong Biden
|
to Lean Biden
| |
1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.
| |||
--
Methodological Note: In past years, FHQ has tried some different ways of dealing with states with no polls or just one poll in the early rounds of these projections. It does help that the least polled states are often the least competitive. The only shortcoming is that those states may be a little off in the order in the Spectrum. In earlier cycles, a simple average of the state's three previous cycles has been used. But in 2016, FHQ strayed from that and constructed an average swing from 2012 to 2016 that was applied to states. That method, however, did little to prevent anomalies like the Kansas poll that had Clinton ahead from biasing the averages. In 2016, the early average swing in the aggregate was too small to make much difference anyway. For 2020, FHQ has utilized an average swing among states that were around a little polled state in the rank ordering on election day in 2016. If there is just one poll in Delaware in 2020, for example, then maybe it is reasonable to account for what the comparatively greater amount of polling tells us about the changes in Connecticut, New Jersey and New Mexico. Or perhaps the polling in Iowa, Mississippi and South Carolina so far tells us a bit about what may be happening in Alaska where no public polling has been released. That will hopefully work a bit better than the overall average that may end up a bit more muted.
--
Related posts:
The Electoral College Map (8/9/20)
The Electoral College Map (8/7/20)
The Electoral College Map (8/6/20)
Follow FHQ on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook or subscribe by Email.
No comments:
Post a Comment