| Rasmussen Polls Since w/Leaners Distinction was Added (7/9/08)* | |||||
| State | w/o Leaners | w/Leaners | Change | Undecideds Drop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri | +5 | +5 | 0 | -10 | |
| New Jersey | +5 | +3 | +2 | -4 | |
| Illinois | +13 | +11 | +2 | -6** | |
| North Dakota | 0 | +1 | +1 | -7** | |
| Wisconsin | +13 | +10 | +3 | -6 | |
| Louisiana | +20 | +19 | +1 | -2 | |
| South Dakota | +4 | +4 | 0 | -4 | |
| Washington | +9 | +8 | +1 | -6 | |
| Iowa | +10 | +10 | 0 | -9 | |
| Michigan | +8 | +8 | 0 | -5 | |
| Minnesota (7/10) | +18 | +17 | +1 | 0 | |
| Kansas | +20 | +23 | +3 | -9 | |
| North Carolina | +3 | +3 | 0 | -5 | |
| Oregon | +9 | +9 | 0 | -5 | |
| Nevada | +2 | +2 | 0 | -5 | |
| Virginia | 0 | +1 | +1 | -6 | |
| Alaska | +5 | +5 | 0 | -7 | |
| Arkansas | +10 | +13 | +3 | -4 | |
| Georgia | +9 | +11 | +2 | +1 | |
| Maine | +10 | +8 | +2 | -2 | |
| Polls below this point were conducted after Obama left to go abroad (7/19/08). | |||||
| Colorado | +7 | +3 | +4 | -13 | |
| Ohio | +6 | +10 | +4 | -7 | |
| Florida | +1 | +2 | +1 | -7 | |
| Minnesota (7/22) | +12 | +13 | +1 | --*** | |
| New Hampshire | +6 | +4 | +2 | -5 | |
| Pennsylvania | +5 | +6 | +1 | -8 | |
| New Mexico | +5 | +6 | +1 | -6 | |
| Avg. Change | +0.96 | -5.5 | |||
| *The "with leaners" distinction was added to reports that were released beginning on 7/9/08. The date on which these polls were conducted (The ones that these releases were based on) stretches back to 7/7/08. **Rasmussen has only conducted one poll in these states. Therefore, the difference was taken from between the with and without leaner numbers within the same poll in these cases. ***Previous poll had been taken after "with leaners" change had been made. | |||||
Above that yellow line, Louisiana is the only state where the "with leaners" distinction favored Obama. But since Obama started his trip overseas, and incidentally this is where the coincidence potentially comes in, four of the seven polls to be released show Obama with the edge when leaners are included. Does this mean that leaners are starting to break for Obama? And, further, does the trip have anything to do with it?
Are leaners breaking toward Obama?
It certainly looks that way. Are these simply Obama states in the first place, though? With the exception of Florida, all seven states are states that are Obama states in FHQ's most recent look at the electoral college (Well, Ohio changes sides depending on whether you use Rasmussen's leaners or without leaners data.). But that wasn't the case in the polls taken before Obama left. Of the 12 states where there was a difference between the with leaners and without leaners numbers, six were Obama states and all six saw drops in the margin when leaners were added. The other eight states, where there was no difference in the margins once leaners were added, were equal parts McCain and Obama states and all broke in McCain's direction. It seems then, that it isn't just a matter of the states polled since Obama left being Obama states.
Fine, just more than half of the seven states where polls have been conducted since Obama left have leaners favoring him now (Well, that does quintuple the number of states that were in that category in the first place.). That is a switch, but does that mean that the trip is what triggered the change? Maybe, maybe not. Rasmussen's own daily tracking poll does have Obama bouncing. And the "with leaners" numbers at least appear to show Obama gaining among that group in states where respondents have been surveyed since Obama left at the outset of last weekend. Coincidence it may be, but it is an interesting way of going about assessing whether Obama has gained anything out of this trip. If this is evidence--and even I'm skeptical of that--of Obama getting a boost from this overseas tour, then it is among the group in the middle that is likely to decide this election.
Recent Posts:
Is Florida a Swing State?
The Deal with Those Rasmussen "Leaners"
The Electoral College Map (7/23/08)
