A new Magellan Strategies survey (pdf) has Sarah Palin leading her prospective 2012 rivals in Kentucky.
1. Sarah Palin 28%
2. Mike Huckabee 24%
3. Mitt Romney 16%
4. Newt Gingrich 12%
5. Ron Paul 4%
6. Tim Pawlenty 2%
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
It's too bad Kentucky's primary is so late
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Gallup on 2012: Obama in a Deadlock with Generic Republican
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Palin for President
Friday, January 22, 2010
PPP: 2012 Presidential Trial Heats (Jan. '10): Obama Trails (Huckabee) for the First Time
Obama: 44%
Obama: 49%
Palin: 41%
Undecided: 9%
Obama: 44%
Petraeus: 34%
Undecided: 21%
Obama: 44%
Romney: 42%
Undecided: 15%
Margin of Error: +/- 2.8%
Sample: 1151 registered voters (nationwide)
Conducted: January 18-19, 2010
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
MA Senate Special: Open Thread
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Final Democratic Change Commission Meeting
The DNC Change Commission held its final (hour-long) meeting this afternoon (by conference call). The Commission approved a draft report that recommends converting most automatic unpledged “superdelegates” to pledged delegates who will fill slots reflecting the voter preferences in their state’s primary or caucuses – thus becoming automatic, pledged, voting convention delegates. The DNC Rules and Bylaws Commission (RBC) will consider the Commission’s report and then forward proposed delegate selection rules to the DNC for action later in 2010.Frank has more on superdelegates, but FHQ will focus on the primary timing aspect of the proceedings today.
Calendar: Under the Commission’s proposal numerous states (including Virginia) will have to move their primaries back to after March 1. It will be easier to achieve date changes in 2012 if the RNC agrees to have a similar starting date. Nevertheless, some states will be in a situation where there is a state mandated primary date which does not comply with the DNC’s schedule. The RBC will reexamine the delegate selection rules which provide for sanctions and exceptions.No, there's nothing new there and FHQ has certainly documented the potential pitfalls in this March 1 plan if the Republican Party does not follow suit with a similar calendar.
I'll have more when Frank gets the full recommendations up.
Recent Posts:
Merry Christmas from FHQ
The 2009 Census Population Estimates are Now Public
Tis the Season
Friday, December 25, 2009
Merry Christmas from FHQ
Recent Posts:
The 2009 Census Population Estimates are Now Public
Tis the Season
Have Things Really Gotten This Bad for Democrats?
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
The 2009 Census Population Estimates are Now Public
Census Bureau: Texas Gains the Most in Population
Last State Population Estimates Before 2010 Census Counts
Texas gained more people than any other state between July 1, 2008, and July 1, 2009 (478,000), followed by California (381,000), North Carolina (134,000), Georgia (131,000) and Florida (114,000), according to the latest U.S. Census Bureau estimatesCalifornia remained the most populous state, with a July 1, 2009, population of 37 million. Rounding out the top five states were Texas (24.8 million), New York (19.5 million), Florida (18.5 million) and Illinois (12.9 million).
"This is the final set of Census Bureau state population estimates that will be published before the official 2010 Census population counts to be released next December," said Census Bureau Director Robert Groves. "We are focused now on ensuring we get a complete and accurate count in 2010. The census counts will not only determine how many U.S. House seats each state will have but will also be used as the benchmark for future population estimates."
Wyoming showed the largest percentage growth: its population climbed 2.12 percent to 544,270 between July 1, 2008, and July 1, 2009. Utah was next largest, growing 2.10 percent to 2.8 million. Texas ranked third, as its population climbed 1.97 percent to 24.8 million, with Colorado next (1.81 percent to 5 million).
The only three states to lose population over the period were Michigan (-0.33 percent), Maine (-0.11 percent) and Rhode Island (-0.03 percent). The latter two states had small population changes.
Other highlights:
- Net domestic migration has slowed dramatically in many states in the South and West, including Nevada, Arizona, Idaho, North Carolina, South Carolina and Montana.
- Several states have negative net domestic migration, which means more people are moving out than moving in. Florida and Nevada, which earlier in the decade had net inflows, are now experiencing new outflows.
- Louisiana’s July 1, 2009 population, 4.5 million, is up 40,563, or 0.91 percent, from a year earlier.
- The nation’s population as of July 1, 2009, was 307 million, an increase of 0.86 percent since July 1, 2008.
- The estimated July 1, 2009, population for Puerto Rico was 4 million, up by 0.32 percent (12,735) from one year earlier.
The population to congressional seat gain/loss report should be up later this week sometime. I'll get an updated map for 2012 up when that information is made available.
Recent Posts:
Tis the Season
Have Things Really Gotten This Bad for Democrats?
Who's Happy with a the Parties' Tentative Outline of a Primary Calendar for 2012?
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Tis the Season
On another note, we'd like to apologize for being quiet the last few days. Winston Salem got hit by the snowstorm that has made its way up the eastern seaboard and, well, I've been distracted. Hopefully something will be up late tonight and with some more regularity this week.
Recent Posts:
Have Things Really Gotten This Bad for Democrats?
Who's Happy with a the Parties' Tentative Outline of a Primary Calendar for 2012?
USA Today Presidential Approval Tracker is Now in FHQ's Side Bar
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Have Things Really Gotten This Bad for Democrats?
Are liberals serious about this? FHQ is sure some are -- there are only 35 votes on that poll -- but c'mon. I don't understand the purism on the extreme end of both parties. If you want to get something -- anything -- done, you have to have members of your party in power (And yes, that means members of the same party with differing viewpoints.). Undercutting this president or any other is simply political fratricide. All or nothing is no way to approach American politics. It never has been, and in a supermajoritarian body like the Senate, it never will be.
Recent Posts:
Who's Happy with a the Parties' Tentative Outline of a Primary Calendar for 2012?
USA Today Presidential Approval Tracker is Now in FHQ's Side Bar
Public Policy Polling: December 2009 Presidential Trial Heats In Depth