Public Policy Polling [pdf] has released its August edition of its 2012 trial heat polls. Here are the results of interest. I'll be back a little later with a deeper look and updated graphics.
Obama: 49%
Gingrich: 41%
Not Sure: 10%
Obama: 47%
Huckabee: 44%
Not Sure: 10%
Obama: 52%
Palin: 38%
Not Sure: 10%
Obama: 47%
Romney: 40%
Not Sure: 12%
Margin of error: +/- 3.3 points
Sample: 909 voters (national)
Conducted: August 14-17, 2009
A couple of quickie notes:
1) Palin's gender gap against Obama is still larger than all the other prospective (male) Republicans. She still does worse among women than Gingrich, Huckabee and Romney.
2) The big thing with PPP's July trial heats was that they surveyed each respondent's region and found that Obama swept the South; beating all four prospective Republicans. Region is a question that is noticeably absent from today's release. Why? What is there to hide?
Recent Posts:
State of the Race: Virginia Governor (8/19/09)
State of the Race: New Jersey Governor (8/19/09)
Marist 2012 Presidential Poll: Palin Lags Well Behind Obama but Holds Her Own in the GOP Primary Race
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
State of the Race: Virginia Governor (8/19/09)
As was the case with the New Jersey race for governor, FHQ has fallen behind in Virginia as well. Let's see what we missed (and what impact it has had):
FHQ had put on its Missouri cap at the end of July with the release of the Survey USA poll showing Republican Bob McDonnell cresting above the 50% mark and Creigh Deeds double digits behind. Well, in the time since that poll -- time FHQ was otherwise indisposed -- our "Show Me" attitude has turned a 180 and arrived at "Oh, I see." All four polls since have shown McDonnell around 50% and Deeds further back in the upper 30s to lower 40s range.
[Click to Enlarge]
Together, these polls, in addition to the earlier ones FHQ is considering in its graduated weighted averages of this race, put McDonnell ahead by right at ten points at the moment. And while the gap in the New Jersey race might be ever so slightly contracting, the race in the Old Dominion is headed in the other direction entirely. If you're a Democrat from Virginia or not, you have to be wondering where the Bush administration's loyalty rating of Bob McDonnell is (or at least a Virginia version of what may be a game changer in New Jersey*).
I read the word balance used in connection with this race recently (I'll have to track down the link.) and it is being used in a way I don't know that I've ever encountered. The idea proposed was that Virginians might be opting for McDonnell to balance out the recent Democratic shift in the state at the national level. Typically, we talk of balance in terms of ticket balancing; choosing an executive (on either the federal or state level) from one party and a legislative representative from the other as a means putting a check on the power of government. But this is balancing based not on an interbranch basis but in terms of levels within the federalist system. Nationally, then, Virginia has shifted toward the left; electing a pair of Democratic senators since 2006 and Barack Obama as president in 2008. In a state where Republicans control the House and Democrats control the Senate by the narrowest of margins, Virginians could opt to send McDonnell into office with a newly GOP-controlled Senate, pitting the GOP state government against the Democratic folks sent by the state to act in the federal government. This is a new idea to me. One I'll have to look at a bit more closely (or at least search for some research within the political science literature). Certainly, this is an altogether different type of sophisticated voting.
.png)
[Click to Enlarge]
The trendline at least is more interesting to look at than the New Jersey version. Instead of a rather static picture, the Virginia race offers a distinct trend in McDonnell's direction across the polls conducted since the Washington Post's primary endorsement of Creigh Deeds. Deeds' dilemma is trying to figure out a way to reverse the current trajectory of the race. With Labor Day on the horizon, it is getting down to crunch time.
*It remains to be seen whether the Bush/Christie link will inflict any sustained damage on the Christie campaign, but it is out there as an issue now. There will need to be more polls conducted to show whether that revelation is having any real long term influence on the race. The "Show Me" attitude is now shifting northward to the Garden state.
NOTE: For once, it is nice to have said that something is coming tomorrow and be able to put it out early. Too often, I end up saying something is coming tomorrow only to have it come out the day after that.
Recent Posts:
State of the Race: New Jersey Governor (8/19/09)
Marist 2012 Presidential Poll: Palin Lags Well Behind Obama but Holds Her Own in the GOP Primary Race
Which Republican is the Biggest Threat in 2012?
| Virginia Gubernatorial Polls (July 31-Aug. 18) | |||||
| Poll | Date | Deeds | McDonnell | Undecided | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington Post | Aug. 11-14, 2009 | 39 | 54 | 7 | |
| Rasmussen | Aug. 5-9, 2009 | 41 | 49 | 7 | |
| Daily Kos/Research 2000 | Aug. 3-5, 2009 | 43 | 51 | 6 | |
| Public Policy Polling [pdf] | Aug. 4, 2009 | 37 | 51 | 12 | |
FHQ had put on its Missouri cap at the end of July with the release of the Survey USA poll showing Republican Bob McDonnell cresting above the 50% mark and Creigh Deeds double digits behind. Well, in the time since that poll -- time FHQ was otherwise indisposed -- our "Show Me" attitude has turned a 180 and arrived at "Oh, I see." All four polls since have shown McDonnell around 50% and Deeds further back in the upper 30s to lower 40s range.
[Click to Enlarge]Together, these polls, in addition to the earlier ones FHQ is considering in its graduated weighted averages of this race, put McDonnell ahead by right at ten points at the moment. And while the gap in the New Jersey race might be ever so slightly contracting, the race in the Old Dominion is headed in the other direction entirely. If you're a Democrat from Virginia or not, you have to be wondering where the Bush administration's loyalty rating of Bob McDonnell is (or at least a Virginia version of what may be a game changer in New Jersey*).
I read the word balance used in connection with this race recently (I'll have to track down the link.) and it is being used in a way I don't know that I've ever encountered. The idea proposed was that Virginians might be opting for McDonnell to balance out the recent Democratic shift in the state at the national level. Typically, we talk of balance in terms of ticket balancing; choosing an executive (on either the federal or state level) from one party and a legislative representative from the other as a means putting a check on the power of government. But this is balancing based not on an interbranch basis but in terms of levels within the federalist system. Nationally, then, Virginia has shifted toward the left; electing a pair of Democratic senators since 2006 and Barack Obama as president in 2008. In a state where Republicans control the House and Democrats control the Senate by the narrowest of margins, Virginians could opt to send McDonnell into office with a newly GOP-controlled Senate, pitting the GOP state government against the Democratic folks sent by the state to act in the federal government. This is a new idea to me. One I'll have to look at a bit more closely (or at least search for some research within the political science literature). Certainly, this is an altogether different type of sophisticated voting.
.png)
[Click to Enlarge]The trendline at least is more interesting to look at than the New Jersey version. Instead of a rather static picture, the Virginia race offers a distinct trend in McDonnell's direction across the polls conducted since the Washington Post's primary endorsement of Creigh Deeds. Deeds' dilemma is trying to figure out a way to reverse the current trajectory of the race. With Labor Day on the horizon, it is getting down to crunch time.
*It remains to be seen whether the Bush/Christie link will inflict any sustained damage on the Christie campaign, but it is out there as an issue now. There will need to be more polls conducted to show whether that revelation is having any real long term influence on the race. The "Show Me" attitude is now shifting northward to the Garden state.
NOTE: For once, it is nice to have said that something is coming tomorrow and be able to put it out early. Too often, I end up saying something is coming tomorrow only to have it come out the day after that.
Recent Posts:
State of the Race: New Jersey Governor (8/19/09)
Marist 2012 Presidential Poll: Palin Lags Well Behind Obama but Holds Her Own in the GOP Primary Race
Which Republican is the Biggest Threat in 2012?
State of the Race: New Jersey Governor (8/19/09)
Yeah, it has been a while -- almost a month in fact -- since the last polling update in the New Jersey gubernatorial race. I moved. What can I say? Anyway, here are the polls we've yet to incorporate:
Before I get into the specifics, let me make a note on the inclusion of one poll (Democracy Corps) and the exclusion of another (Global Strategy Group). I'll admit, I wrestled over including the Democracy Corps poll, but ultimately fell back on what I did regarding the polling outfit during the presidential campaign. I included them. Again, I'm cognizant of the fact that what were dealing with here is an organization that leans left, but I draw the line between partisan leaning and partisan aligned in these cases. FHQ would not, for instance, use the numbers from a Republican Governors Association poll, but we are in the habit of accepting the numbers from right leaning Strategic Vision. The same is true in this case. The Democracy Corps numbers are included while the New Jersey Democratic Assembly sanctioned Global Strategy Group poll is not.
And yet, despite its inclusion, the Democracy Corps poll is not putting Corzine in the lead, or even closing the gap substantially with Christie.
[Click to Enlarge]
Over nearly a month's time, then, Corzine has remained stationary while Chris Christie has dropped less than half a point. And most of the latter's drop is attributable to the most recent poll, which it is safe to say is an outlier given the state of most of the other polls. Corzine has gotten more aggressive in terms of pushing the Bush/Christie link of late and that will have to stick to some significant degree for the incumbent to pull Christie back down to earth. I will say this: If Corzine can string together a series of good polls, it will be much easier for the media to take up the "comeback" story (as something different in the race) and for the race to fall into line with "this is the Democrats coming home to Corzine" pattern we've all been primed to expect. Of course the competing storyline is that this race and the Virginia race are harbingers of a Republican resurgence at the national level. Virginia will have something to say about that, but FHQ will have more on the state of the race in the commonwealth tomorrow.
.png)
[Click to Enlarge]
The trendlines above aren't terribly exciting, so I may try and add in the actual polling fluctuations along with the FHQ average trendline to provide a more informative picture of the progress. Be on the lookout for that in the next update.
Recent Posts:
Marist 2012 Presidential Poll: Palin Lags Well Behind Obama but Holds Her Own in the GOP Primary Race
Which Republican is the Biggest Threat in 2012?
2012 New Hampshire Republican Primary Poll: Romney Up Big
| New Jersey Gubernatorial Polls (July 31-Aug. 18) | |||||
| Poll | Date | Corzine | Christie | Daggett | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democracy Corps [pdf] | Aug. 11-12, 2009 | 35 | 40 | 10 | 15 |
| Quinnipiac | Aug. 5-9, 2009 | 40 | 46 | 7 | 6 |
| Daily Kos/Research 2000 | Aug. 3-5, 2009 | 40 | 48 | -- | 9 |
| Rasmussen | Aug. 4, 2009 | 37 | 50 | -- | 8 |
| Monmouth/Gannett [pdf] | July 29-Aug. 2, 2009 | 36 | 50 | 4 | 8 |
| Public Policy Polling [pdf] | July 24-27, 2009 | 36 | 50 | -- | 14 |
Before I get into the specifics, let me make a note on the inclusion of one poll (Democracy Corps) and the exclusion of another (Global Strategy Group). I'll admit, I wrestled over including the Democracy Corps poll, but ultimately fell back on what I did regarding the polling outfit during the presidential campaign. I included them. Again, I'm cognizant of the fact that what were dealing with here is an organization that leans left, but I draw the line between partisan leaning and partisan aligned in these cases. FHQ would not, for instance, use the numbers from a Republican Governors Association poll, but we are in the habit of accepting the numbers from right leaning Strategic Vision. The same is true in this case. The Democracy Corps numbers are included while the New Jersey Democratic Assembly sanctioned Global Strategy Group poll is not.
And yet, despite its inclusion, the Democracy Corps poll is not putting Corzine in the lead, or even closing the gap substantially with Christie.
[Click to Enlarge]Over nearly a month's time, then, Corzine has remained stationary while Chris Christie has dropped less than half a point. And most of the latter's drop is attributable to the most recent poll, which it is safe to say is an outlier given the state of most of the other polls. Corzine has gotten more aggressive in terms of pushing the Bush/Christie link of late and that will have to stick to some significant degree for the incumbent to pull Christie back down to earth. I will say this: If Corzine can string together a series of good polls, it will be much easier for the media to take up the "comeback" story (as something different in the race) and for the race to fall into line with "this is the Democrats coming home to Corzine" pattern we've all been primed to expect. Of course the competing storyline is that this race and the Virginia race are harbingers of a Republican resurgence at the national level. Virginia will have something to say about that, but FHQ will have more on the state of the race in the commonwealth tomorrow.
.png)
[Click to Enlarge]The trendlines above aren't terribly exciting, so I may try and add in the actual polling fluctuations along with the FHQ average trendline to provide a more informative picture of the progress. Be on the lookout for that in the next update.
Recent Posts:
Marist 2012 Presidential Poll: Palin Lags Well Behind Obama but Holds Her Own in the GOP Primary Race
Which Republican is the Biggest Threat in 2012?
2012 New Hampshire Republican Primary Poll: Romney Up Big
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Marist 2012 Presidential Poll: Palin Lags Well Behind Obama but Holds Her Own in the GOP Primary Race
Marist set the 2012 jokes aside for a moment and actually got involved in the early polling for the next presidential election. Nationally, the Marist University poll probed its 938 respondents on questions focused on Sarah Palin, but for 2012, matched the former Alaska governor against President Obama and gauged her odds in the race for the Republican nomination as well. The results? In the general election, not so good. But in an early look at the primary race, Palin was once again closely clustered with both Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee setting the 2012 pace. Newt Gingrich, Bobby Jindal and Tim Pawlenty trailed that group to varying degrees and nearly a quarter of the respondents were still undecided. That's a pretty good chunk of those polled still playing the wait and see game. In fact, "unsure" would win if the election were held today. Reminds you of Jimmy Carter losing to "uncommitted" in the 1976 Iowa caucuses yet still winning the contest, doesn't it? That is the highest that type of figure has been. Of course, this is asking "unsure" but doesn't include "other" along with it to incorporate those who might feel strongly about a candidate off this list.
Let's look at the results and their attendant graphics. First the general election match up:
.png)
[Click to Enlarge]
Obama: 56%
Palin: 33%
Margin of error: +/- 3.5 points
Sample: 854 registered voters
Conducted: August 3-6, 2009
First of all, the rub on a lot of these polls lately has been the divide between the registered voter results and the likely voter results. This poll is made up of registered voters and that likely is helping bump up Obama's support. Likely voters would give us a more Republican flavor and Palin would hypothetically be closer. Still, Obama would undoubtedly be ahead in a likely voter sample. The one thing were missing here (and Public Policy Polling will help me out with this tomorrow.) is another Republican polled against Obama. Without that, we are deprived of the interesting gender gap numbers we've seen among the Republicans versus Obama. Other Republicans have been running ahead of Palin against Obama among women in other polls.
And the Republican primary race?
[Click to Enlarge]
Romney: 21%
Palin: 20%
Huckabee: 19%
Gingrich: 10%
Jindal: 5%
Pawlenty: 1%
Unsure: 24%
Margin of error: +/- 5.5 points
Sample: 310 Republicans (& Republican-leaning independents)
Conducted: August 3-6, 2009
There isn't much new here that we haven't discussed either earlier in this post or in conjunction with another primary poll. It isn't like the wide margin in the Palin-Obama trial heat (a figure that runs counter to the closing gap witnessed over the last several months.). Again, at this early point, it is Romney, Palin and Huckabee in no particular order and then everyone else. That doesn't mean someone else won't be the GOP nominee in 2012, but these are the top options as of August 2009 (and throughout the year for that matter).
NOTE: There should be some additional 2012 numbers from PPP sometime tomorrow.
Recent Posts:
Which Republican is the Biggest Threat in 2012?
2012 New Hampshire Republican Primary Poll: Romney Up Big
Rick Santorum for President? ...and Romney in Iowa
Let's look at the results and their attendant graphics. First the general election match up:
.png)
[Click to Enlarge]Obama: 56%
Palin: 33%
Margin of error: +/- 3.5 points
Sample: 854 registered voters
Conducted: August 3-6, 2009
First of all, the rub on a lot of these polls lately has been the divide between the registered voter results and the likely voter results. This poll is made up of registered voters and that likely is helping bump up Obama's support. Likely voters would give us a more Republican flavor and Palin would hypothetically be closer. Still, Obama would undoubtedly be ahead in a likely voter sample. The one thing were missing here (and Public Policy Polling will help me out with this tomorrow.) is another Republican polled against Obama. Without that, we are deprived of the interesting gender gap numbers we've seen among the Republicans versus Obama. Other Republicans have been running ahead of Palin against Obama among women in other polls.
And the Republican primary race?
[Click to Enlarge]Romney: 21%
Palin: 20%
Huckabee: 19%
Gingrich: 10%
Jindal: 5%
Pawlenty: 1%
Unsure: 24%
Margin of error: +/- 5.5 points
Sample: 310 Republicans (& Republican-leaning independents)
Conducted: August 3-6, 2009
There isn't much new here that we haven't discussed either earlier in this post or in conjunction with another primary poll. It isn't like the wide margin in the Palin-Obama trial heat (a figure that runs counter to the closing gap witnessed over the last several months.). Again, at this early point, it is Romney, Palin and Huckabee in no particular order and then everyone else. That doesn't mean someone else won't be the GOP nominee in 2012, but these are the top options as of August 2009 (and throughout the year for that matter).
NOTE: There should be some additional 2012 numbers from PPP sometime tomorrow.
Recent Posts:
Which Republican is the Biggest Threat in 2012?
2012 New Hampshire Republican Primary Poll: Romney Up Big
Rick Santorum for President? ...and Romney in Iowa
Monday, August 17, 2009
Which Republican is the Biggest Threat in 2012?
This wasn't the question that Greenberg Quinlan and Rosner posed to the participants at Netroots Nation, but if you reverse the ordering of the results, you'd get a rough idea of who liberals and progressives find are the biggest threats to Barack Obama's re-election bid in 2012. First, though, let's look at the question and the results [pdf]:
Q.16 Of the main contenders for the 2012 Republican nomination for President, please indicate
who, in your opinion, would be the easiest to beat.
Total
Sarah Palin.......................................................................... 36
Rick Santorum..................................................................... 20
Bobby Jindal........................................................................ 12
Ron Paul .............................................................................. 7
Rudy Giuliani........................................................................ 5
Jeb Bush.............................................................................. 4
Jon Kyl ................................................................................. 3
Mike Huckabee.................................................................... 2
Tim Pawlenty........................................................................ 1
Mitt Romney......................................................................... 1
(No Answer) ........................................................................ 9
Margin of error: n/a
Sample: 252 conference participants
Conducted: August 13-14, 2009
252 respondents is hardly representative of Democrats as a whole (much less the Republicans who will largely decide who their 2012 nominee will be), but I would wager a guess that this result is a pretty good representation of those attending Netroots. Regardless, Palin is perceived to be the easiest for Obama to beat in 2012 (over a third of the respondents) with Romney and Pawlenty bringing up the rear with only one percent each. Again, this isn't necessarily the same question, but if we flip those results, we would likely have at least a close approximation of the Republican whom those at NN see as the best challenger to the president three years hence.
Other than telling me that some Republicans out there are now ready to write checks to Romney and Pawlenty, this list makes me think of the Democrats vying for the party's nomination in 2004. I've tried to link the prospective 2012 Republican presidential field to the Democratic field in 2008, but the the better comparison may be 2004, especially in lieu of the fact that the GOP will be in the same position the Democrats were in in 2004: out of the White House and out of power on the Hill. Who were the 2004 principals and who are their 2012 counterparts?
John Kerry: Mitt Romney (early frontrunner who may or may not stumble along the way to the nomination)
John Edwards: Tim Pawlenty (up-and-comer making a populist appeal)
Dick Gephardt: Mike Huckabee (solid, if uninspiring choice, but at the wrong place at the wrong time)
Howard Dean: Sarah Palin (heart-on-the-sleeve type who effectively uses technology to make their appeals to an enthusiastic base within the party)
Will it play out that way? Perhaps, though not in anything resembling the same order. Palin, for instance, may or may not have already had her Dean Scream moment. One thing I will say is that a Romney/Pawlenty ticket wouldn't be a bad choice for the Party of Lincoln.
Back to the poll: No Thune. No Barbour. And most glaringly, no Gingrich. Is that because none of those three would be "easy" to beat or because not one of the 252 respondents thought of them as potential 2012 candidates? I'd lean toward the latter, but I don't consider that margin to be very wide between those two camps. In fact, the more I think about it, the more I find I'm reconsidering that answer.
Hat tip to GOP12 for the link.
Recent Posts:
2012 New Hampshire Republican Primary Poll: Romney Up Big
Rick Santorum for President? ...and Romney in Iowa
Democratic Change Commission Set to Reconvene in St. Louis on August 29
Q.16 Of the main contenders for the 2012 Republican nomination for President, please indicate
who, in your opinion, would be the easiest to beat.
Total
Sarah Palin.......................................................................... 36
Rick Santorum..................................................................... 20
Bobby Jindal........................................................................ 12
Ron Paul .............................................................................. 7
Rudy Giuliani........................................................................ 5
Jeb Bush.............................................................................. 4
Jon Kyl ................................................................................. 3
Mike Huckabee.................................................................... 2
Tim Pawlenty........................................................................ 1
Mitt Romney......................................................................... 1
(No Answer) ........................................................................ 9
Margin of error: n/a
Sample: 252 conference participants
Conducted: August 13-14, 2009
252 respondents is hardly representative of Democrats as a whole (much less the Republicans who will largely decide who their 2012 nominee will be), but I would wager a guess that this result is a pretty good representation of those attending Netroots. Regardless, Palin is perceived to be the easiest for Obama to beat in 2012 (over a third of the respondents) with Romney and Pawlenty bringing up the rear with only one percent each. Again, this isn't necessarily the same question, but if we flip those results, we would likely have at least a close approximation of the Republican whom those at NN see as the best challenger to the president three years hence.
Other than telling me that some Republicans out there are now ready to write checks to Romney and Pawlenty, this list makes me think of the Democrats vying for the party's nomination in 2004. I've tried to link the prospective 2012 Republican presidential field to the Democratic field in 2008, but the the better comparison may be 2004, especially in lieu of the fact that the GOP will be in the same position the Democrats were in in 2004: out of the White House and out of power on the Hill. Who were the 2004 principals and who are their 2012 counterparts?
John Kerry: Mitt Romney (early frontrunner who may or may not stumble along the way to the nomination)
John Edwards: Tim Pawlenty (up-and-comer making a populist appeal)
Dick Gephardt: Mike Huckabee (solid, if uninspiring choice, but at the wrong place at the wrong time)
Howard Dean: Sarah Palin (heart-on-the-sleeve type who effectively uses technology to make their appeals to an enthusiastic base within the party)
Will it play out that way? Perhaps, though not in anything resembling the same order. Palin, for instance, may or may not have already had her Dean Scream moment. One thing I will say is that a Romney/Pawlenty ticket wouldn't be a bad choice for the Party of Lincoln.
Back to the poll: No Thune. No Barbour. And most glaringly, no Gingrich. Is that because none of those three would be "easy" to beat or because not one of the 252 respondents thought of them as potential 2012 candidates? I'd lean toward the latter, but I don't consider that margin to be very wide between those two camps. In fact, the more I think about it, the more I find I'm reconsidering that answer.
Hat tip to GOP12 for the link.
Recent Posts:
2012 New Hampshire Republican Primary Poll: Romney Up Big
Rick Santorum for President? ...and Romney in Iowa
Democratic Change Commission Set to Reconvene in St. Louis on August 29
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
2012 New Hampshire Republican Primary Poll: Romney Up Big
Now Hampshire and Populus Research have a new poll out on the 2012 race in the Republican primary in the Granite state. I'll be interested to see the cross tabs on this one when and if they are released. The gender splits when Sarah Palin has been involved in surveys have been interesting (women moving away from the former Alaska governor in the head to heads against Obama) to say the least. Here are the results:
Romney: 50%
Palin: 17%
Huckabee: 17%
Gingrich: 13%
Pawlenty: 3%
Margin of error: +/- 5 points
Sample: 403 likely Republican primary voters
Conducted: 8/10-11/09
FHQ will have more on this when the full results are made available. At first glance, Romney is getting about half of the McCain support from the 2008 New Hampshire primary (if this poll is representative) to get to 50%. Despite the commanding lead, that seems a low amount for Romney to be pulling from McCain supporters (even if on the surface).
Hat tip to Pollster for the link.
Recent Posts:
Rick Santorum for President? ...and Romney in Iowa
Democratic Change Commission Set to Reconvene in St. Louis on August 29
The 2012 Presidential Candidates on Twitter (July 2009)
Romney: 50%
Palin: 17%
Huckabee: 17%
Gingrich: 13%
Pawlenty: 3%
Margin of error: +/- 5 points
Sample: 403 likely Republican primary voters
Conducted: 8/10-11/09
FHQ will have more on this when the full results are made available. At first glance, Romney is getting about half of the McCain support from the 2008 New Hampshire primary (if this poll is representative) to get to 50%. Despite the commanding lead, that seems a low amount for Romney to be pulling from McCain supporters (even if on the surface).
Hat tip to Pollster for the link.
Recent Posts:
Rick Santorum for President? ...and Romney in Iowa
Democratic Change Commission Set to Reconvene in St. Louis on August 29
The 2012 Presidential Candidates on Twitter (July 2009)
Rick Santorum for President? ...and Romney in Iowa
How many social conservative presidential candidates does it take to hand Mitt Romney the 2012 Republican presidential nomination?
Palin
Huckabee
Santorum
The 2012 primary calendar, if it remains similar to 2008, sets up nicely for Romney. Stay in the top three in Iowa, win New Hampshire, win Nevada, keep it close in South Carolina and win in Florida before Super Tuesday and that is likely good enough to put Romney over the top. That's a classic frontrunner's path to the nomination.
Now, none of the above three folks have thrown their hats in the 2012 ring, but let's assume for a minute that all three and Mitt Romney are in. You never know what Sarah Palin is going to do, Huckabee, I think, will opt for another go of it unless he continues to struggle with the financial end of the campaign, and Rick Santorum is off to Iowa for some speaking commitments this fall. I don't know, but if those three announce that they intend to seek the Republican presidential nomination, Romney may be able to win the Iowa caucuses and not look back.
I've mentioned the idea that Palin and Huckabee could split the social conservative vote in Iowa and help Romney win, but if Santorum is in, it seems a social conservative split and Romney win could become a more likely scenario. Huckabee's already a proven commodity in the Hawkeye state after having won the caucuses in 2008, and Palin is a known quantity, but what about Santorum? Doesn't he have also-ran written all over him after losing his reelection bid to his Pennsylvania Senate seat in 2006? Well, yeah. The former senator doesn't even register on this Palin-less version of the 2012 Candidate Tracker:
[Click to Enlarge]
However, Santorum strikes me as someone who is outspoken enough on issues important to social conservatives (abortion and gay marriage especially) to pull in a fervent following in the Hawkeye state. He'd be more Ron Paul than Duncan Hunter in 2008 for instance. This is, after all, someone Glenn Beck called a "Winston Churchill type" in a February 2008 interview with NPR. There is something there, but it remains to be seen whether a Santorum candidacy is one that would be able to catch on.
Regardless of whether Santorum announces his candidacy and/or draws some interest in such a capacity, let's take a closer look at Iowa in 2012. Romney received a quarter of the vote in Iowa in 2008 and was polling around that mark ahead of the caucuses as well. It is unlikely that Romney keeps all of those voters in 2012, but if he comes in as the frontrunner, caucusgoers may be more willing to give him a look. Plus, McCain's share of the vote from 2008 (13%) will be up for grabs as well and those voters will be more likely to move toward Romney than any of the two or three social conservatives. Let's assume that Romney retains 90% of his 2008 vote but that is offset by a "frontrunner bonus." On top of that let's make the modest assumption that Romney pulls in three-quarters of the McCain/Giuliani share of the 2008 Iowa vote. That would net the former Massachusetts governor an additional 12%. That puts Romney at 37%, leaving just 63% for the social conservative candidates to split. Add in Pawlenty and the other candidates likely to enter the race and the math becomes difficult to overcome. If the field is crowded -- and it likely will be -- then 35% will likely be more than enough to win the caucuses.
One thing we've yet to mention, though, is turnout. If Republicans are motivated, then turnout is likely to exceed the levels from 2008. And of course that throws a wrench into the calculations above. No matter what turnout looks like, however, if there is a crowded social conservative field, the product is going to be watered down and the likelihood of Romney slipping in the back door and winning increases.
I think Santorum's reception in Iowa is worth keeping tabs on.
Recent Posts:
Democratic Change Commission Set to Reconvene in St. Louis on August 29
The 2012 Presidential Candidates on Twitter (July 2009)
FHQ is back...
Palin
Huckabee
Santorum
The 2012 primary calendar, if it remains similar to 2008, sets up nicely for Romney. Stay in the top three in Iowa, win New Hampshire, win Nevada, keep it close in South Carolina and win in Florida before Super Tuesday and that is likely good enough to put Romney over the top. That's a classic frontrunner's path to the nomination.
Now, none of the above three folks have thrown their hats in the 2012 ring, but let's assume for a minute that all three and Mitt Romney are in. You never know what Sarah Palin is going to do, Huckabee, I think, will opt for another go of it unless he continues to struggle with the financial end of the campaign, and Rick Santorum is off to Iowa for some speaking commitments this fall. I don't know, but if those three announce that they intend to seek the Republican presidential nomination, Romney may be able to win the Iowa caucuses and not look back.
I've mentioned the idea that Palin and Huckabee could split the social conservative vote in Iowa and help Romney win, but if Santorum is in, it seems a social conservative split and Romney win could become a more likely scenario. Huckabee's already a proven commodity in the Hawkeye state after having won the caucuses in 2008, and Palin is a known quantity, but what about Santorum? Doesn't he have also-ran written all over him after losing his reelection bid to his Pennsylvania Senate seat in 2006? Well, yeah. The former senator doesn't even register on this Palin-less version of the 2012 Candidate Tracker:
[Click to Enlarge]However, Santorum strikes me as someone who is outspoken enough on issues important to social conservatives (abortion and gay marriage especially) to pull in a fervent following in the Hawkeye state. He'd be more Ron Paul than Duncan Hunter in 2008 for instance. This is, after all, someone Glenn Beck called a "Winston Churchill type" in a February 2008 interview with NPR. There is something there, but it remains to be seen whether a Santorum candidacy is one that would be able to catch on.
Regardless of whether Santorum announces his candidacy and/or draws some interest in such a capacity, let's take a closer look at Iowa in 2012. Romney received a quarter of the vote in Iowa in 2008 and was polling around that mark ahead of the caucuses as well. It is unlikely that Romney keeps all of those voters in 2012, but if he comes in as the frontrunner, caucusgoers may be more willing to give him a look. Plus, McCain's share of the vote from 2008 (13%) will be up for grabs as well and those voters will be more likely to move toward Romney than any of the two or three social conservatives. Let's assume that Romney retains 90% of his 2008 vote but that is offset by a "frontrunner bonus." On top of that let's make the modest assumption that Romney pulls in three-quarters of the McCain/Giuliani share of the 2008 Iowa vote. That would net the former Massachusetts governor an additional 12%. That puts Romney at 37%, leaving just 63% for the social conservative candidates to split. Add in Pawlenty and the other candidates likely to enter the race and the math becomes difficult to overcome. If the field is crowded -- and it likely will be -- then 35% will likely be more than enough to win the caucuses.
One thing we've yet to mention, though, is turnout. If Republicans are motivated, then turnout is likely to exceed the levels from 2008. And of course that throws a wrench into the calculations above. No matter what turnout looks like, however, if there is a crowded social conservative field, the product is going to be watered down and the likelihood of Romney slipping in the back door and winning increases.
I think Santorum's reception in Iowa is worth keeping tabs on.
Recent Posts:
Democratic Change Commission Set to Reconvene in St. Louis on August 29
The 2012 Presidential Candidates on Twitter (July 2009)
FHQ is back...
Monday, August 10, 2009
Democratic Change Commission Set to Reconvene in St. Louis on August 29
On Friday, the Democratic Party announced the upcoming second meeting of its Democratic Change Commission. [The full press release is appended at the conclusion of the post.] The first meeting in June was a matter of fact-finding for the members of the group as opposed to a full-scale, reform-intensive discussion. And while new ground wasn't broken then, the next meeting on August 29 will take things one step further by incorporating the recommendations of those interested in weighing in on the presidential primary reform process.
[Click to Go to Form]
Again, this isn't anything new. We knew at the end of June that the Change Commission would be meeting again on August 29, but the public recommendation part of this meeting is an interesting way to open up the process. Granted, the party can and probably will pick and choose which suggestions are ultimately discussed. Still, this is a nice use of technology to get input from the party faithful and those interested in an altered nomination process.
Click on the form above to go to the actual form and provide suggestions of your own. The deadline for submissions is Friday August 21. The meeting is scheduled for August 29 in St. Louis.
Here at FHQ we have had a rather robust discussion concerning primary reform throughout the tenure of this blog, but if you're so inclined, include your suggestions for reform in the comments section below. We've debated the various plans on an on-again-off-again basis, but what are your personal preferences for presidential primary reform?
Hat tip to Don Means at the National Presidential Caucus for the heads up on the press release.
--------------------
------------------------
Recent Posts:
The 2012 Presidential Candidates on Twitter (July 2009)
FHQ is back...
State of the Race: Virginia (7/31/09)
[Click to Go to Form]Again, this isn't anything new. We knew at the end of June that the Change Commission would be meeting again on August 29, but the public recommendation part of this meeting is an interesting way to open up the process. Granted, the party can and probably will pick and choose which suggestions are ultimately discussed. Still, this is a nice use of technology to get input from the party faithful and those interested in an altered nomination process.
Click on the form above to go to the actual form and provide suggestions of your own. The deadline for submissions is Friday August 21. The meeting is scheduled for August 29 in St. Louis.
Here at FHQ we have had a rather robust discussion concerning primary reform throughout the tenure of this blog, but if you're so inclined, include your suggestions for reform in the comments section below. We've debated the various plans on an on-again-off-again basis, but what are your personal preferences for presidential primary reform?
Hat tip to Don Means at the National Presidential Caucus for the heads up on the press release.
--------------------
August 7, 2009
Contact: Caroline Ciccone – 202-863-8148
DNC’s Democratic Change Commission Invites People From Across the Country to Submit Their Ideas for Changes to Presidential Nominating Process
To submit ideas, click on: http://www.democrats.org/page/s/changecommission
Next Meeting to Be Held in St. Louis August 29
Washington, DC—Today, DNC Chairman Tim Kaine, along with Congressman James E. Clyburn (D-SC) and Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO), co-chairs of the Democratic Change Commission, invited people from across the nation to assist the Change Commission by submitting their suggestions and ideas for making changes to the presidential nominating process via the Commission’s website, http://www.democrats.org/page/s/changecommission, by Friday, August 21, 2009. These suggestions will be discussed at the next Change Commission meeting to be held Saturday, August 29, 2009 at the Crowne Plaza St. Louis-Downtown Hotel in St. Louis, Missouri.
The Democratic Change Commission was established last year and is tasked with recommending changes to the Party’s 2012 presidential nominating process. It is charged with addressing three issues: 1) changing the window of time during which primaries and caucuses may be held 2) reducing the number of superdelegates and 3) improving the caucus system. The Commission must issue its report and recommendations to the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee no later than January 1, 2010.
Chairman Kaine said, “America was founded in order to create a government that is of, for and by the people and what developed is one of the strongest democracies in history. Our election system is fundamental to the strength of our democracy and of our country as a whole. That’s why the Change Commission aims to make sure the Presidential nominating process is as inclusive as possible and why we are asking people to submit their thoughts and ideas and be a part of the process.”
Congressman Clyburn said, “As the Change Commission studies these three issues, we are interested in hearing recommendations from folks across the country. We encourage voters to submit their thoughts as we work to make the process of selecting our nominee as inclusive and accessible as possible.”
Senator McCaskill said, “In this last election, we saw an unprecedented level of involvement and interest in the Democratic Presidential Nominating Process. We hope voters will maintain their enthusiasm and help us determine how best to prepare for future elections.”
Information provided to the Commission via the website by Friday, August 21, 2009 will be distributed to the Commission members at their upcoming meeting on August 29 in St. Louis, Missouri. The meeting is open to the public and press. Details on the meeting location are below:
Next meeting of the Change Commission
Saturday, August 29, 9:30 am
Crowne Plaza St. Louis-Downtown Hotel
200 North Fourth Street
St. Louis, Missouri
------------------------
Recent Posts:
The 2012 Presidential Candidates on Twitter (July 2009)
FHQ is back...
State of the Race: Virginia (7/31/09)
Saturday, August 8, 2009
The 2012 Presidential Candidates on Twitter (July 2009)
For the last couple of months FHQ (or @FHQ) has been tracking the Twitter feeds of some (or most) of the prospective 2012 Republican presidential candidates (see the May and June updates). And yes, it's time for a belated update covering the changes from July (and the first 5 days in August).
[Click to Enlarge]
I'm not going to over-analyze this because most of the patterns from the previous iterations earlier in the summer were sustained in July. Newt Gingrich, I think, qualifies as a chronic Twitterer, and as such, has built up quite a following. None of the other possible candidates come close to matching the former speaker's following. And that still has the effect of skewing how the other candidates are perceived with Gingrich included. So let's take him out and see where everyone stands (...other than well behind the Georgian):
[Click to Enlarge]
From this view, Sarah Palin is the new Newt Gingrich. Her post-resignation announcement didn't do anything to hurt her Twitter following, as she saw a more than 100% increase over her total number of Twitter followers entering the month. Of course, with the now former Alaska governor's resignation becoming official on July 26, her @AKGovSarahPalin feed is no more. Now, I've been out of the loop this last week because of my move, but I haven't seen any news of her reappearing on Twitter with a new feed account name. Obviously, as long as Palin is without an account, she can't be accurately counted in these monthly updates and that also introduces the issue of how to account for her new feed and its following once it is up and running. She will, after all, be starting from scratch and it may take her time to clear that 100,000 follower barrier again.
Other than Palin and Gingrich, though, Bobby Jindal and Mike Huckabee continue to have solid followings with Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty further back. Everyone else is lagging. Yeah, John Ensign is in Pawlenty territory in terms of his following, but the Nevada senator and Mark Sanford are still being considered here only to see how their scandals affect their standing in the Twitter-verse. Neither are serious candidates for president in 2012 at this point, if either ever was to begin with in the first place.
[Click to Enlarge]
But here's the thing about all this: Followings are somewhat dependent upon how often someone is tweeting (and who they are). If we shift to observing the number of tweets each candidate has per day (based on the number of days since the candidate began using Twitter), we again see Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich at the top, well ahead of the other prospective Republican presidential candidates. And while that may be the case, we don't really get a sense of how much bang for the buck each candidate is getting from using Twitter. For that we need an index that compares the tweets per day data above to the number of followers; something FHQ will call the Follower Ratio. This controls not only for the time aspect (how long each candidate has been using Twitter), but the number of other Twitter users following them as well. The higher the follower ratio, then, the more a candidate is getting out of the service. For instance, you can tweet all that time, but if no one's watching, what does it matter (The old, if a tree falls in the forest question.)? Once we take those factors into account, what do the usages of Twitter by the prospective 2012 Republican presidential candidates look like?
[Click to Enlarge]
Gingrich is still up there, but suddenly Sarah Palin has dropped off. The former Alaska governor is not getting the same level of return on her tweeting investment as the former speaker. Yet, now Bobby Jindal and Mitt Romney have improved positions vis a vis the other potential candidates. In other words, for what each is putting into Twitter, they are getting a fairly good return on that usage. Each has a pretty good following considering both Jindal and Romney put next to nothing into Twitter. For Jindal, that means a tweet every four days or so and for Romney, a tweet approximately every eleven days. While they aren't tweeting with Gingrich-like frequency, they are getting a good return on a small investment. Couched in slightly different terms, there seems to be a good level of interest in both Jindal and Romney's Twitter feeds despite the fact that they only rarely update them. Contrast that with someone like Mike Huckabee, who tweets almost twice a day, but doesn't have the following to match that rate. It would be interesting to compare that figure to various PAC contributions to see whether the interest on Twitter in any way correlates to the interest in contributing. Looking at the PAC receipts, the ordering matches up: Romney > Palin > Huckabee.
In any event, this ratio will be something to keep our eye on over time.
Recent Posts:
FHQ is back...
State of the Race: Virginia (7/31/09)
State of the Race: New Jersey (7/31/09)
[Click to Enlarge]I'm not going to over-analyze this because most of the patterns from the previous iterations earlier in the summer were sustained in July. Newt Gingrich, I think, qualifies as a chronic Twitterer, and as such, has built up quite a following. None of the other possible candidates come close to matching the former speaker's following. And that still has the effect of skewing how the other candidates are perceived with Gingrich included. So let's take him out and see where everyone stands (...other than well behind the Georgian):
[Click to Enlarge]From this view, Sarah Palin is the new Newt Gingrich. Her post-resignation announcement didn't do anything to hurt her Twitter following, as she saw a more than 100% increase over her total number of Twitter followers entering the month. Of course, with the now former Alaska governor's resignation becoming official on July 26, her @AKGovSarahPalin feed is no more. Now, I've been out of the loop this last week because of my move, but I haven't seen any news of her reappearing on Twitter with a new feed account name. Obviously, as long as Palin is without an account, she can't be accurately counted in these monthly updates and that also introduces the issue of how to account for her new feed and its following once it is up and running. She will, after all, be starting from scratch and it may take her time to clear that 100,000 follower barrier again.
Other than Palin and Gingrich, though, Bobby Jindal and Mike Huckabee continue to have solid followings with Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty further back. Everyone else is lagging. Yeah, John Ensign is in Pawlenty territory in terms of his following, but the Nevada senator and Mark Sanford are still being considered here only to see how their scandals affect their standing in the Twitter-verse. Neither are serious candidates for president in 2012 at this point, if either ever was to begin with in the first place.
[Click to Enlarge]But here's the thing about all this: Followings are somewhat dependent upon how often someone is tweeting (and who they are). If we shift to observing the number of tweets each candidate has per day (based on the number of days since the candidate began using Twitter), we again see Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich at the top, well ahead of the other prospective Republican presidential candidates. And while that may be the case, we don't really get a sense of how much bang for the buck each candidate is getting from using Twitter. For that we need an index that compares the tweets per day data above to the number of followers; something FHQ will call the Follower Ratio. This controls not only for the time aspect (how long each candidate has been using Twitter), but the number of other Twitter users following them as well. The higher the follower ratio, then, the more a candidate is getting out of the service. For instance, you can tweet all that time, but if no one's watching, what does it matter (The old, if a tree falls in the forest question.)? Once we take those factors into account, what do the usages of Twitter by the prospective 2012 Republican presidential candidates look like?
[Click to Enlarge]Gingrich is still up there, but suddenly Sarah Palin has dropped off. The former Alaska governor is not getting the same level of return on her tweeting investment as the former speaker. Yet, now Bobby Jindal and Mitt Romney have improved positions vis a vis the other potential candidates. In other words, for what each is putting into Twitter, they are getting a fairly good return on that usage. Each has a pretty good following considering both Jindal and Romney put next to nothing into Twitter. For Jindal, that means a tweet every four days or so and for Romney, a tweet approximately every eleven days. While they aren't tweeting with Gingrich-like frequency, they are getting a good return on a small investment. Couched in slightly different terms, there seems to be a good level of interest in both Jindal and Romney's Twitter feeds despite the fact that they only rarely update them. Contrast that with someone like Mike Huckabee, who tweets almost twice a day, but doesn't have the following to match that rate. It would be interesting to compare that figure to various PAC contributions to see whether the interest on Twitter in any way correlates to the interest in contributing. Looking at the PAC receipts, the ordering matches up: Romney > Palin > Huckabee.
In any event, this ratio will be something to keep our eye on over time.
Recent Posts:
FHQ is back...
State of the Race: Virginia (7/31/09)
State of the Race: New Jersey (7/31/09)
Thursday, August 6, 2009
FHQ is back...
...emerging from a pile of broken down cardboard boxes, bubble wrap and electronics cords. We've got some post-move catching up to do around here.
Recent Posts:
State of the Race: Virginia (7/31/09)
State of the Race: New Jersey (7/31/09)
Last Athens Post
Recent Posts:
State of the Race: Virginia (7/31/09)
State of the Race: New Jersey (7/31/09)
Last Athens Post
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)